Pharmaceutical
Liability Attorneys
No Recovery, No Fee.
GUARANTEED
Pharmaceutical Liability
​
Pharmaceutical liability, also known as drug manufacturer liability, involves holding drug companies accountable for damages caused by their medications. When a pharmaceutical product causes harm, patients may have the right to seek compensation through legal action. This complex area of law covers a range of issues from defective drug design and improper manufacturing processes to failure to warn about potential side effects.
​
​
TABLE OF CONTENTS
​
​
​
Who is Liable?
Liability in pharmaceutical cases can be attributed to various parties involved in the production and distribution of a medication, including:
-
Manufacturers: Typically the primary defendants in these cases, manufacturers can be held liable if their product is found to be defective or unreasonably dangerous.
-
Testing Laboratories: Laboratories responsible for drug testing before release can be liable if errors in testing lead to harmful products being sold.
-
Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives: Representatives who provide misleading information about the products can also be held accountable.
-
Healthcare Providers: Prescribing doctors and other healthcare providers may be liable if they fail to provide adequate warnings or prescribe a drug inappropriately.
-
Pharmacies: Retailers and pharmacies might be liable if they dispense the wrong medication or an improper dose.
​
Types of Pharmaceutical Liability Claims
​
-
Defective Manufacturing: Involves drugs that have been improperly manufactured or damaged, resulting in a defect that causes harm.
-
Dangerous Side Effects: Even if manufactured correctly, drugs that lead to dangerous side effects can lead to claims, especially if not properly disclosed.
-
Improper Marketing: Misrepresentation of the drug’s purpose, benefits, or risks can lead to marketing claims.
The Challenge of Proving Pharmaceutical Liability
Proving liability in pharmaceutical cases can be particularly challenging due to the scientific and technical nature of the evidence.
Complex Scientific Evidence
Proving that a drug is defective or dangerous typically requires intricate scientific evidence. Plaintiffs must demonstrate through biological and chemical data how a drug can cause harm. This often involves detailed scientific analyses and the interpretation of clinical trial data, which can be both complex and contentious. Expert witnesses play a crucial role in explaining these scientific principles to a court or jury who may not have a scientific background.
​
Causation
One of the most difficult aspects of pharmaceutical liability cases is establishing causation—that the drug directly caused the injury or harm. Due to the nature of most medical conditions, which can be influenced by various factors, definitively linking the drug to the harm can be challenging. Plaintiffs must show a clear connection between their use of the drug and their injury, often amid arguments from the defense that other factors could be responsible.
Preemption Challenges
Pharmaceutical companies may argue that FDA approval of a drug preempts state law claims for pharmaceutical liability, suggesting that once a drug has been approved by the FDA, claims for injuries cannot be made based on state laws. Navigating these federal preemption issues requires a deep understanding of both federal regulations and state liability laws.
​
Dealing with Large Corporations
Pharmaceutical companies often have significant resources to defend against liability claims, including teams of experienced lawyers and experts. These companies can mount formidable defenses that challenge every aspect of the plaintiff’s case, from the reliability of scientific evidence to the credibility of witnesses.
Regulatory Complexity
Navigating the regulatory environment surrounding pharmaceuticals adds another layer of complexity. Attorneys must be familiar with the regulatory standards that apply to the approval, production, and marketing of drugs, including those set by the FDA. Understanding these standards is crucial to proving whether a drug was marketed or produced in violation of regulatory requirements.
​
Proving pharmaceutical liability requires meticulous preparation, detailed knowledge of both law and science, and the resources to stand up to powerful pharmaceutical companies. For victims, choosing a law firm with specific experience and success in pharmaceutical liability is crucial to navigating these challenges and achieving a favorable outcome.
​
Compensation in Pharmaceutical Liability Cases
Victims of pharmaceutical injuries can seek several types of compensation, reflecting the extensive impacts of such injuries:
​
Medical Expenses
Compensation covers all related medical costs, both past and future. This includes hospital bills, medications, surgeries, and any necessary rehabilitation.
​
Lost Wages
This includes compensation for wages already lost and for future earning capacity if the victim can no longer work as before. Calculations consider the victim’s career trajectory and potential earnings.
Pain and Suffering
This non-economic compensation covers physical pain and emotional distress. The amount varies based on the severity and duration of pain, and its impact on the victim’s quality of life.
Punitive Damages
Awarded in cases of egregious misconduct, these damages are meant to punish the defendant and deter similar behavior, rather than compensate the victim.
​
Why Choose Us?
​
At Phillips & Associates, we have a proven track record of successfully representing victims of pharmaceutical negligence. Our team combines extensive legal knowledge with a compassionate approach to ensure that our clients receive the best possible representation. If you or a loved one has been harmed by a pharmaceutical product, contact us today for a free consultation. We are here to help you navigate through this difficult time and fight for the compensation you deserve.
​
​
​
PRACTICE AREAS
-
Car Accidents
-
Cycling Accidents
-
Bus Accidents
-
Slip-and-Falls
-
Dog Bites
-
Brain Injury
-
Wrongful Death
-
Toxic Torts
-
Product Defects
-
Medical Device Defects
-
Medical Malpractice
-
Food Poisoning
-
Sexual Harassment
-
Wrongful Termination